Friday, 11 September 2009
Sunday, 7 June 2009
Eco-sustainable architecture. Whatever that means?
Human activity is responsible for approximately 27 billion tonnes of carbon emissions globally every year. Approximately 90% of this amount is contributed to by the concrete and airline industries. How can the designers of buildings help more effectively? Stop using concrete? Boycott air travel?
One of the major limiting factors when conceiving, and then implementing eco-sustainable architecture, is in the manufacturing phase. No matter what environmentally conscious devices (photo voltaic panels, green roofs, renewable building materials, passive ventilation, thermal mass etc) are utilised by considerate designers, a disproportionately high amount of energy has to be spent/wasted when actually making buildings.
We believe that one of the most straightforward solutions to this devastating global burden is to, as much as is possible, remove or negate this wasteful construction phase. Like our ancient cavemen predecessors, we should start to use and exploit existing/found treasures to make our homes in (building sites are very inefficient/wasteful places, so pre-fabricated modules/parts are inherently more eco-sustainable). For example the export/import industries use hundreds of thousands of freight containers every year to carry cargo around the world and as it is cheaper to buy a new container than to transport empty ones back to base, a high percentage of them are left empty and unused. This is obviously a problem in terms of cluttering the landscape, but also a huge waste of a very useful (and structurally sound) object with a high level of embodied energy (due to what it’s made of, it’s construction and transportation around the world). The idea (that a few designers have utilised) is to use these containers as a way to create architecture. A simple customisation/modulation of each container is a financially astute and environmentally friendly way to make (amongst other things) affordable homes for many hundreds of thousands of people.
However, this idea is not only limited to freight containers; as depending on the local context and what can be found close to potential construction sites, the possibilities seem endless. We are therefore convinced that by reducing the amount of energy expended during construction phases and utilising, eco-devices, as well as local materials or ready-made structures we can significantly reduce the combined carbon footprint of the worldwide building industries.
Sunday, 26 April 2009
Eco-House (i) Strawbale + Palette Truss
mA were in discussions with Worldhandsproject regarding systems that in the future could be implemented to provide even more recycling of waste and water to fertilise fruit-tree gardens and composting crop beds. The self-contained allotment of the future perhaps necessary in an age where the Earth's natural resources are being exploited so carelessly?
Thursday, 23 April 2009
Good intentions and a dwindling population...
In the 1930’s the population of Glasgow peaked at about 1.1 million people, and for the following fifty years or so remained above one million. However, during the 1960’s the population of Glasgow began to decline, dropping to about 600,000 inhabitants by the start of the new millennium. This was due in part to the major relocation of people to ‘New Towns’ and Glasgow’s peripheral developments, which happened after the clearance of slums and poverty stricken areas such as ‘the Gorbals’. This wholesale break up of deep-rooted communities led to the rise of suburban ‘anti-places’, such as Robroyston. These endless swathes of suburban housing took hold and continue to spread uncontrollably outward, destroying the green belt surrounding the city. If this tumour is not diagnosed swiftly and intelligently then we could potentially end up covering the countryside in a two-storey crust of mediocre cul-de-sacs and not much else.